Aging-In-Place

By Laura Sehn

Living in one community for most or all of one’s life can be a great comfort, but what happens when someone is elderly and becomes less and less able to care for themselves? This can be a frightening and lonely scenario. However, there are ways to allow elders to continue living in their existing communities. Such possibilities include building assisted-living seniors’ residences, adding ‘granny-flats’ to homes, and making modifications to one’s home, if they wish to remain there, in order to create a safer and more accessible living environment.

 

The city in which I grew up in, Beaconsfield, Québec, a suburb of Montréal with a population of approximately 20 000, is a perfect example of how its large elderly population could greatly benefit from an Aging-in-Place program. In the 1950s, this carefully planned suburb began to flourish. With its proximity to Lac-St-Louis, its great number of mature trees and its comfortable homes on spacious lots, Beaconsfield has always been, and still is, a very desirable place to live. Although there are always new families moving into the community, there are many seniors still living in the same homes in which they raised their families over half a century ago.

 

Currently there are no seniors’ residences in the city, simply because there has been a lack of interest on the part of the developers to build the facilities. This has been the case up until this past summer. I worked for the urban planning department of the City of Beaconsfield and there was finally a proposal to build a small seniors’ community on the site of an old school. Although the city does have strict zoning By-Laws, the planning department was on board with this project, fully aware of its need in the community. The proposed site is ideal for seniors. It is located in the historic district of the city, where a large number of seniors currently live, however in aging homes. This location is just a couple blocks from the lake, public parks, and the Beaurepaire Village, where the small local businesses and restaurants would offer all amenities to seniors in a very welcoming and safe setting. Not to mention, bringing a new group of residents to the area would certainly increase their own needed business.

 

Creating new developments like this one gives seniors the freedom to live independently. Often when a senior’s family is unable to provide the adequate care they need, it forces them into institutional-type facilities. Having to live in this environment when it is not necessarily needed, yet seems to be the only option, can be very degrading to seniors. With today’s increased knowledge on how to live long, healthy lives, more and more seniors will find the most comfort from these communities where they can have assistance, if needed, but mostly rely on the companionship and support from their neighbors.

 

Another successful way to allow the elderly to remain in their communities is making granny flats more acceptable in more communities. In Beaconsfield, the city planning department has quite a hypocritical view on this topic. Although they were quite favorable of a new seniors’ community, they are definitely against allowing granny flats in homes. Why is it that if a senior wants to remain in his or her community, they have to be sent to one area in particular?

 

There was a case I dealt with this summer, while working for the City, of a family who had purchased a modest sized home just a year or two ago and now wanted to extend the house in order to allow grandma to live with them as she aged. Even though the proposed extension respected the setbacks and agreed with the City’s Architectural Integration By-Law, meaning the extension would keep the same style of architecture and materials as the existing house, it was the addition of a second kitchen that was an absolute no-no. So the proposal was rejected by all at the Planning Advisory Committee meeting simply because it was in the rules that there were to be no apartment-like additions in homes.

 

It is unfortunate that the City has not thought of changing the zoning laws in order to start allowing granny flats in homes, instead of simply refusing them. Clearly the Planning Department is aware that the city’s population is aging yet they are unwilling to accept that the one seniors’ residence will simply not satisfy the high demand of the seniors to continue living in the beautiful community in which they have always lived. I think if the zoning amendment was brought to Council there would be many that would oppose the change, as some residents seem to oppose any form of change, no matter what it is, or whether or not it affects them. However, this zoning change would probably get the majority vote, considering there are so many seniors in the city and so many families that are probably concerned about the living conditions of their aging parents and grandparents.

 

Although moving into a granny flat in your son or daughter’s home may seem desirable for the added assistance and companionship, most seniors would likely prefer to remain in their own homes. With simple modifications, such as installing grab bars in showers and removing any slipping hazards, seniors can move around their homes more easily and safely. However, in certain situations, more complicated modifications may be needed to ensure the seniors’ safety and the best decision may actually be to move.

 

My family and I often worry about the safety of my grandparents in their home. Although they have made some small modifications to help them get around more safely, there is a lot more that would need to be done in order for their situation to be ideal. They live on the main floor of a triplex, which is raised above grade, and the outdoor stairs, as well as the interior basement stairs, are quite steep and have narrow treads, at least for a couple of eighty-year-olds. With my grandfather’s decreasing mobility and my grandmother losing her vision in one eye, their home in which they have lived for over 40 years is becoming a great danger to them. Unfortunately, they have no intentions to leave this home and it would be quite difficult to try to convince them. Even with a very nice assisted-living seniors’ residence just down the street, which would allow them to remain in their community, they don’t want to leave their home. So in a case like this, how does a family proceed? Do we have to wait for an accident to happen (knock on wood) in order for them to make a change?

 

Although there are some great options available to seniors in their situation, there is work to be done on the social and psychological levels of aging in place. Living in an assisted-living residence, for example, needs to be promoted as a more socially acceptable place to live. I believe that my grandparents would feel as though they were compromising their dignity if they were to move into a ‘home’, even though that would not be the case at all.

 

With the collaboration of government, building professionals, and seniors, the issue of aging in place is becoming increasingly more important in communities. Cities such as Burlington, Ontario, have truly accommodated their aging population with many different living options available. Yet there are others, like Beaconsfield, that even with their attempts, still need to see many changes made before this issue is properly addressed.

 

 

Sources

 

Pastalan, Leon, Making Aging in Place Work, Journal of Housing for the Elderly. Binghamton: The Haworth Press, 1999.

 

Cox, Carole, Community Care for an Aging Society. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 2005.

 

Seniorressource.com, “Aging in Place”, http://www.seniorresource.com/ageinpl.htm

 

City of Burlington website, “Accessibility”, http://cms.burlington.ca